Agoracrux
Debate adjudication

Judge the argument, not the room.

Agoracrux scores every round against a rubric you set, keeps each judge's reasoning attached to the score that carries it, and turns ballots into standings that hold up when a team asks how they lost.

Rubric-bound
Judges score named criteria at fixed weights, not an overall impression.
On the record
Every score carries the written reason that justifies it.
Auditable
Standings recompute from ballots, so any rank can be traced back.

This house would abolish closed primaries

Sample · Semifinal
Proposition
Kestrel A
Ilhan Reyes · Dara Okonkwo
v.
Opposition
Meridian B
Yuki Tanaka · Sam Alvarez
34.5 Argumentation 40% 31.0
21.0 Evidence 25% 22.5
17.5 Rebuttal 20% 15.0
12.0 Delivery 15% 12.5
Proposition +4.0
Panel 2–1 · 85.0 to 81.0
Rubrics

A score means nothing until it names what it measured.

You define the criteria and their weights before the round opens. Judges score against those criteria and nothing else, which is what makes two ballots comparable.

Weighted criteria

Build the rubric your format already uses — British Parliamentary, Lincoln–Douglas, policy, or your own. Weights are fixed at publication so they can't drift mid-tournament.

argumentation 40 · evidence 25 · rebuttal 20 · delivery 15

Reason-giving

A score outside the expected band asks the judge to say why before the ballot will submit. The reason travels with the score into the record.

Independent ballots

Panellists can't see each other's scores until all ballots are in, so the first submission doesn't anchor the rest of the panel.

Judge calibration

Agoracrux tracks how far each judge sits from panel consensus over time and surfaces persistent drift — a judge who runs generous on delivery, or harsh on evidence.

Standings

Rankings that recompute from the ballots underneath them.

Ratings update as each round resolves. Every figure below traces back to the ballots that produced it — open a team and you get the rounds, the panels, and the reasoning.

Sample league table — after round 14
# Team Institution Rating W–L Avg margin Δ
1 Kestrel A1 seed Northgate 1842 14–2 +6.4 +23
2 Meridian B St. Alban 1798 13–3 +4.9 −11
3 Thornbury A Thornbury 1776 12–4 +3.8 +8
4 Halloway C Halloway 1741 11–5 +2.1 +14
5 Ravensmoor A Ravensmoor 1709 10–6 +1.3 −6

Open your first round.

Bring a rubric and a bracket. Agoracrux handles the ballots, the panel, and the table.